BDFIX vs. CTSIX
BDFIX (Baron Discovery Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BDFIX returned -0.03%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for CTSIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDFIX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 33.58% return.
BDFIX
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
CTSIX
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 33.58%
- 6M
- 31.44%
- 1Y
- 65.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDFIX Baron Discovery Fund | 0.75% | 10.96% | 16.28% | 22.58% | -35.12% | 4.84% | 66.15% | 8.45% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 33.58% | 25.90% | 44.34% | 7.57% | -37.30% | 9.12% | 63.38% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDFIX and CTSIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BDFIX and CTSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDFIX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank
BDFIX
CTSIX
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Discovery Fund (BDFIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDFIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 5.34 | -4.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 21.95 | -20.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDFIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.38 | -1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.38 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDFIX drawdown since its inception was -46.39%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDFIX and CTSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDFIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.39% | -50.83% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.94% | -12.38% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.26% | -28.40% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | -50.60% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -1.48% | -6.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -20.62% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.92% | 3.01% | +2.91% |
Volatility
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Discovery Fund (BDFIX) is 5.14%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that BDFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDFIX | CTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 9.58% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 21.21% | -6.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 27.74% | -8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 28.00% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 29.78% | -4.56% |
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BDFIX and CTSIX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
BDFIX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither BDFIX nor CTSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDFIX Baron Discovery Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 0.13% | 8.78% | 0.21% | 1.97% |
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.77% | 4.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDFIX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTSIX has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to BDFIX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDFIX dropped -46.39% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.
CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDFIX and CTSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer