PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDBT vs. USDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDBT vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than USDX's 1.79% return.


BDBT

1D
0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.79%
6M
2.25%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDBT vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BDBT
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF
0.20%3.68%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
1.79%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and USDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

-0.00

BDBT vs. USDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDBT
USDX

Financial Services

100.0%
84.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BDBT
100.0%
USDX
84.7%

Basic Materials

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Communication Services

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Consumer Defensive

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Energy

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Healthcare

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Industrials

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Real Estate

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Technology

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Utilities

BDBT

-

USDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDBT vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDBT

USDX
USDX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBT vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDBT vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDBTUSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

3.96

-2.88

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and USDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDBTUSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-0.94%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.64%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.06%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

Volatility

BDBT vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDBTUSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

1.93%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

1.68%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.83%

1.68%

+2.15%

BDBT vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDBT vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than USDX's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BDBT
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF
3.52%2.21%0.00%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
5.90%5.88%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDBT and USDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 3.52% for BDBT.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.98% for USDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDBT and USDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer