PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCPIX vs. UTBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCPIX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than UTBPX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BCPIX has underperformed UTBPX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while UTBPX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.


BCPIX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.01%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.44%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
1.72%

UTBPX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
0.04%6.71%1.98%6.70%-10.78%-0.34%5.77%6.65%-0.45%2.74%
UTBPX
UBS Multi Income Bond Fund
0.93%6.60%1.67%6.67%-11.74%-1.49%6.51%10.62%-2.08%4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BCPIX and UTBPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.83

The correlation between BCPIX and UTBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCPIX vs. UTBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCPIX
BCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

UTBPX
UTBPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
UTBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UTBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCPIXUTBPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.87

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

6.93

-2.85

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the UTBPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCPIX and UTBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCPIX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, which is greater than UTBPX's maximum drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPIX and UTBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCPIXUTBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-16.84%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-2.98%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-5.33%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

-16.84%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.19%

-16.84%

+1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.81%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-4.01%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.80%

+0.10%

Volatility

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Volatility Comparison

Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund (BCPIX) and UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) have volatilities of 1.17% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCPIXUTBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

1.19%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

3.14%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

3.98%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

4.88%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

4.36%

-0.18%

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCPIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UTBPX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCPIX vs. UTBPX - Dividend Comparison

BCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, which matches UTBPX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCPIX
Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund
4.22%4.32%3.67%2.91%2.54%1.89%1.76%2.77%2.90%2.49%2.84%2.72%
UTBPX
UBS Multi Income Bond Fund
4.25%4.18%4.53%3.54%2.84%1.89%2.11%2.80%3.05%2.46%1.68%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCPIX and UTBPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTBPX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to BCPIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCPIX dropped -22.43% vs UTBPX's -16.84%.

UTBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCPIX and UTBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer