BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BCOM.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF) and LGUS.L (L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - BCOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while LGUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCOM.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for LGUS.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCOM.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUS.L.

Performance

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOM.L achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than LGUS.L's 10.45% return.

BCOM.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 16.43%
• YTD: 20.25%
• 1Y: 29.55%
• 3Y*: 12.61%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

LGUS.L

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 1Y: 22.44%
• 3Y*: 20.44%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BCOM.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF	20.25%	16.19%	4.43%	-7.25%	15.63%	27.35%	-2.99%	5.14%	-6.54%
LGUS.L L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	10.45%	17.98%	25.09%	28.66%	-20.46%	27.91%	21.16%	30.91%	-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOM.L and LGUS.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.23

The correlation between BCOM.L and LGUS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOM.L

BCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

LGUS.L

LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCOM.L	LGUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.79	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.71	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.61	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	10.04	-3.54

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOM.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.65%, smaller than the maximum LGUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOM.L and LGUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCOM.L	LGUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.65%	-34.26%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-8.58%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	-19.46%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.27%	-25.64%	-0.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.78%	-0.39%	-8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-5.30%	-6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	2.23%	+2.31%

Volatility

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to L&G US Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LGUS.L) at 2.87%. This indicates that BCOM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCOM.L	LGUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	2.87%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.81%	9.41%	+5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	12.47%	+4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	16.51%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	18.10%	-2.75%

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BCOM.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCOM.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCOM.L and LGUS.L in my portfolio?

BCOM.L and LGUS.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCOM.L or LGUS.L?

On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCOM.L or LGUS.L?

LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BCOM.L.

What is the main difference between BCOM.L and LGUS.L?

BCOM.L is categorized as Commodities, while LGUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. BCOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while LGUS.L tracks Solactive Core United States Large & Mid Cap Index NTR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BCOM.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.