PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BCOM.L is traded in USD, while DEL2.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DEL2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOM.L achieves a 20.90% return, which is significantly higher than DEL2.L's -2.76% return.


BCOM.L

1D
0.64%
1M
2.17%
6M
16.01%
YTD
20.90%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*

DEL2.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-8.13%
YTD
-2.76%
1Y
-1.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCOM.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF
20.90%16.19%4.43%-7.25%15.63%27.35%-2.99%5.14%-9.87%6.89%
DEL2.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.76%55.69%23.51%38.94%-32.05%21.17%4.49%43.28%-38.64%15.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOM.L and DEL2.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017

0.17

The correlation between BCOM.L and DEL2.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOM.L
BCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DEL2.L
DEL2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DEL2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCOM.LDEL2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

-0.07

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

-0.21

+6.86

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the DEL2.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOM.L and DEL2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.65%, smaller than the maximum DEL2.L drawdown of -68.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOM.L and DEL2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCOM.LDEL2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.65%

-68.93%

+37.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-27.05%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.33%

-29.73%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.27%

-56.47%

+30.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.29%

-8.94%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-18.99%

+7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

8.86%

-4.33%

Volatility

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) is 4.53%, while L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that BCOM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEL2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCOM.LDEL2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

9.63%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

28.89%

-14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

33.93%

-17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

36.96%

-20.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

37.64%

-22.29%

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOM.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DEL2.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCOM.L vs. DEL2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCOM.L nor DEL2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCOM.L and DEL2.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCOM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DEL2.L.

BCOM.L is categorized as Commodities, while DEL2.L is Leveraged Equities. BCOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while DEL2.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BCOM.L and 0.40% for DEL2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCOM.L and DEL2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer