BCKT vs. SPTB
BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and SPTB (State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BCKT is actively managed, while SPTB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTB.
Performance
BCKT vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCKT achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPTB's 0.04% return.
BCKT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 3.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCKT vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 0.36% | 1.09% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 0.04% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCKT and SPTB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCKT vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank
BCKT
SPTB
BCKT vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCKT | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.93 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
BCKT vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum SPTB drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and SPTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCKT | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -4.96% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.84% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -1.32% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.98% | — |
Volatility
BCKT vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCKT | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53% | 3.64% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 4.41% | -2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 4.41% | -2.88% |
BCKT vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCKT vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison
BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than SPTB's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 17.95% | 5.36% | 0.00% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 4.20% | 4.23% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCKT and SPTB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCKT.
BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 4.20% for SPTB.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 0.03% for SPTB.
Find the right allocation for BCKT and SPTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer