BCKT vs. IBTE
BCKT (LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. BCKT is actively managed, while IBTE is passively managed. BCKT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.
Performance
BCKT vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCKT vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 0.06% |
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCKT vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCKT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BCKT vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCKT drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCKT and IBTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCKT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | 0.00% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | 0.00% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Volatility
BCKT vs. IBTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCKT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53% | 0.00% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 0.00% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.53% | 0.00% | +1.53% |
BCKT vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCKT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCKT vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison
BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCKT LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF | 17.95% | 5.36% |
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BCKT.
BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.
They also come from different issuers: Stone Ridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BCKT and 0.07% for IBTE.
Find the right allocation for BCKT and IBTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer