PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCIIX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund (BCIIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCIIX achieves a -8.25% return, which is significantly lower than GSINX's 6.39% return.


BCIIX

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.20%
YTD
-8.25%
6M
-8.69%
1Y
-15.75%
3Y*
1.19%
5Y*
-3.42%
10Y*
2.96%

GSINX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCIIX
Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund
-8.25%-0.24%-0.83%28.36%-31.37%7.46%24.49%21.59%-11.98%23.52%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.39%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BCIIX and GSINX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between BCIIX and GSINX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCIIX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCIIX
BCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund (BCIIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCIIXGSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.23

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

1.55

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

5.17

-6.46

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCIIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCIIX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCIIXGSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

1.25

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.63

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.81

-0.60

Drawdowns

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCIIX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCIIXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.12%

-28.80%

-32.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.62%

-7.80%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-10.32%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.22%

-25.46%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.60%

-3.72%

-20.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.15%

-4.85%

-11.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.60%

2.33%

+10.27%

Volatility

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund (BCIIX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 2.75%. This indicates that BCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCIIXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.75%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

7.89%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

9.68%

+6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

14.37%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

15.69%

+0.56%

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCIIX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

BCIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCIIX
Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%0.64%2.99%0.62%0.80%0.77%1.84%0.31%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCIIX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCIIX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to GSINX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCIIX dropped -61.12% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

GSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCIIX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer