PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFE.DE achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than UBUS.DE's 11.92% return.


BCFE.DE

1D
1.85%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.93%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*

UBUS.DE

1D
0.78%
1M
4.69%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.63%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCFE.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
8.60%16.64%3.14%-7.90%14.00%30.29%-0.93%3.55%-10.75%4.20%
UBUS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
11.92%0.40%13.97%12.38%-2.90%41.54%-3.81%33.57%-4.25%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFE.DE and UBUS.DE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.11

The correlation between BCFE.DE and UBUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFE.DE
BCFE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

UBUS.DE
UBUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCFE.DEUBUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.72

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

11.98

-5.05

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the UBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCFE.DE and UBUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFE.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, which is greater than UBUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFE.DE and UBUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFE.DEUBUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.94%

-30.27%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.95%

-6.12%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-21.83%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.27%

-21.83%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

0.00%

-11.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-5.07%

-8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.90%

+0.94%

Volatility

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that BCFE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFE.DEUBUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

2.63%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

8.06%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

11.82%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

14.72%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

15.84%

-0.66%

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFE.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UBUS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFE.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

BCFE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBUS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BCFE.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.11%1.24%0.67%1.52%1.62%1.56%1.89%1.30%1.93%1.60%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCFE.DE and UBUS.DE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFE.DE.

BCFE.DE is categorized as Commodities, while UBUS.DE is Large Cap Value Equities. BCFE.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged), while UBUS.DE tracks MSCI USA Prime Value. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFE.DE and 0.25% for UBUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFE.DE and UBUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer