PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SEAB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFE.DE achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than SEAB.DE's 1.46% return.


BCFE.DE

1D
-1.12%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
17.15%
6M
19.15%
1Y
29.80%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*

SEAB.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BCFE.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
17.15%16.62%3.14%-7.92%14.03%30.33%-0.98%3.51%-10.97%
SEAB.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
1.46%7.70%5.52%5.69%-12.28%-0.75%1.22%4.80%-2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFE.DE and SEAB.DE is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.15

The correlation between BCFE.DE and SEAB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFE.DE
BCFE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SEAB.DE
SEAB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SEAB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEAB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SEAB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCFE.DESEAB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

2.88

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

12.50

-0.61

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SEAB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCFE.DE and SEAB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCFE.DESEAB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.28

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.20

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.22

+0.27

Drawdowns

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFE.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, which is greater than SEAB.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFE.DE and SEAB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFE.DESEAB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.93%

-18.05%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.14%

-2.09%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.00%

-2.41%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.28%

-18.05%

-9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-0.11%

-4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.69%

-4.83%

-8.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

0.48%

+2.02%

Volatility

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SEAB.DE) at 0.79%. This indicates that BCFE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEAB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFE.DESEAB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

0.79%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

2.19%

+9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

2.64%

+11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

4.44%

+13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

5.13%

+10.17%

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFE.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SEAB.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFE.DE vs. SEAB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFE.DE nor SEAB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCFE.DE and SEAB.DE have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCFE.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCFE.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for SEAB.DE.

BCFE.DE is categorized as Commodities, while SEAB.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. BCFE.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged), while SEAB.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFE.DE and 0.38% for SEAB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFE.DE and SEAB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer