BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and HDIV.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -40.36% vs 45.50% for HDIV.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than HDIV.TO's 16.21% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -17.13%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 45.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -27.54% | -6.58% |
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 16.21% | 34.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and HDIV.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
HDIV.TO
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCCL.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.68 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 5.24 | -6.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 25.39 | -26.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCCL.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 | 3.67 | -4.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 1.26 | -1.95 |
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -52.47%, which is greater than HDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and HDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.47% | -22.32% | -30.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.47% | -8.73% | -43.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.69% | -0.63% | -50.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -4.22% | -17.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.80% | 1.80% | +28.00% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) at 3.80%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | HDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 3.80% | +8.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.89% | 10.29% | +22.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.98% | 12.47% | +31.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 15.63% | +28.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 15.63% | +28.02% |
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.66%, more than HDIV.TO's 9.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 40.66% | 16.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF | 9.33% | 10.09% | 11.38% | 10.41% | 9.64% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCL.NEO and HDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton Capital.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and HDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer