PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAT vs. CLOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAT vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAT achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly higher than CLOI's 2.06% return.


BCAT

1D
-1.38%
1M
4.40%
YTD
20.75%
6M
19.94%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*

CLOI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAT vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BCAT
BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust
20.75%16.78%19.37%19.30%1.19%
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
2.06%5.84%8.26%8.95%2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAT and CLOI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAT vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAT
BCAT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOI
CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAT vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCATCLOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.16

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

8.95

-5.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

42.16

-24.69

BCAT vs. CLOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is lower than the CLOI Sharpe Ratio of 4.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAT and CLOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCATCLOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

4.72

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

2.77

-2.21

Drawdowns

BCAT vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAT drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than CLOI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAT and CLOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCATCLOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-3.25%

-32.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-0.62%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-3.25%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

0.00%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-0.19%

-12.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

0.13%

+1.54%

Volatility

BCAT vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.14%. This indicates that BCAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCATCLOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

0.14%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

0.67%

+7.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

1.19%

+9.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

2.56%

+12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

2.56%

+13.35%

Dividends

BCAT vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison

BCAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.33%, more than CLOI's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BCAT
BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust
20.33%23.45%17.48%10.08%9.01%6.42%0.48%
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
5.35%5.61%6.71%5.61%2.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCAT and CLOI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCAT has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to CLOI (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAT dropped -36.13% vs CLOI's -3.25%.

CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAT and CLOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer