PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAMX vs. VIIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VIIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAMX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than VIIIX's 11.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BCAMX has underperformed VIIIX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while VIIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.72% annualized return.


BCAMX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.76%
6M
6.83%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
12.75%

VIIIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.93%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
23.12%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
15.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCAMX
Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund
7.76%14.23%23.81%21.04%-18.15%24.49%19.53%28.17%-8.51%20.64%
VIIIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.55%17.87%26.29%25.79%-18.14%28.69%18.41%31.48%-4.41%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAMX and VIIIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2012

0.97

The correlation between BCAMX and VIIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAMX vs. VIIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAMX
BCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VIIIX
VIIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VIIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VIIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VIIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCAMXVIIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

2.55

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.46

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.38

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.21

15.85

-3.64

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the VIIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAMX and VIIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCAMXVIIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.55

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.87

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.50

+0.24

Drawdowns

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum VIIIX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAMX and VIIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCAMXVIIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-55.18%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-8.90%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-18.75%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-24.50%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-33.79%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-10.02%

+5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.90%

-0.05%

Volatility

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VIIIX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCAMXVIIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.82%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

8.99%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

11.88%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.89%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

18.06%

-0.19%

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VIIIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCAMX vs. VIIIX - Dividend Comparison

BCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than VIIIX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAMX
Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund
5.79%6.24%6.22%1.55%6.30%4.25%0.35%3.94%5.47%3.13%1.89%0.88%
VIIIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.41%2.11%3.66%2.66%3.39%4.79%3.07%2.86%2.45%1.84%2.38%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BCAMX and VIIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VIIIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to BCAMX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAMX dropped -33.06% vs VIIIX's -55.18%.

VIIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAMX and VIIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer