BCAMX vs. SVPFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BCAMX (Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BCAMX returned 11.17%/yr vs 2.08%/yr for SVPFX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCAMX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.

Performance

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAMX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.49% return.

BCAMX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 21.92%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

SVPFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: 4.40%
• 5Y*: 2.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCAMX Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund	7.76%	14.23%	23.81%	21.04%	-18.15%	15.62%
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund	1.49%	4.19%	3.82%	5.30%	-4.37%	0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAMX and SVPFX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021	0.13

The correlation between BCAMX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCAMX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAMX

BCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 48
BCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SVPFX

SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCAMX	SVPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.35	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.40	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.53	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.72	-1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.21	11.52	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAMX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCAMX	SVPFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.35	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.38	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.39	+0.35

Drawdowns

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAMX and SVPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCAMX	SVPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.06%	-6.37%	-26.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-1.33%	-7.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-5.32%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.22%	-6.37%	-19.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-1.93%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	0.43%	+1.42%

Volatility

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that BCAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCAMX	SVPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	0.67%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	1.47%	+7.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.46%	2.26%	+9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	5.60%	+11.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.87%	5.51%	+12.36%

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCAMX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

BCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCAMX Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund	5.79%	6.24%	6.22%	1.55%	6.30%	4.25%	0.35%	3.94%	5.47%	3.13%	1.89%	0.88%
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund	2.47%	1.83%	4.37%	4.29%	0.76%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCAMX and SVPFX in my portfolio?

BCAMX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCAMX or SVPFX?

BCAMX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAMX dropped -33.06% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.