BCAMX vs. PAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX).
BCAMX is managed by Boston Common. It was launched on Apr 30, 2012. PAGRX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.
Performance
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAMX Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund | -7.17% | 14.23% | 23.81% | 21.04% | -18.15% | 24.49% | 19.53% | 28.17% | -8.51% | 20.64% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | -3.85% | 36.92% | 44.52% | 38.73% | -26.06% | 24.84% | 37.65% | 40.34% | -12.41% | 21.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCAMX achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than PAGRX's -3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BCAMX has underperformed PAGRX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while PAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.68% annualized return.
BCAMX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -7.17%
- 6M
- -4.76%
- 1Y
- 12.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
PAGRX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 39.42%
- 3Y*
- 34.02%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCAMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCAMX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
BCAMX
PAGRX
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCAMX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.55 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 2.25 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.59 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 13.26 | -8.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCAMX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.55 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.77 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.52 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCAMX and PAGRX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison
BCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAMX Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund | 6.72% | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.55% | 6.30% | 4.25% | 0.35% | 3.94% | 5.47% | 3.13% | 1.89% | 0.88% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | 0.03% | 0.03% | 5.62% | 2.72% | 7.79% | 6.82% | 15.08% | 17.51% | 12.33% | 8.70% | 16.94% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAMX and PAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCAMX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -55.87% | +22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -13.80% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | -36.52% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.06% | -38.01% | +4.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -9.14% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -10.09% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.70% | -0.43% |
Volatility
BCAMX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) is 4.02%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that BCAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCAMX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 5.49% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 13.43% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 25.49% | -8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 24.49% | -7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 24.47% | -6.64% |