PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAMX vs. ORDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and North Square Preferred and Income Securities Fund (ORDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAMX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than ORDNX's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BCAMX has outperformed ORDNX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while ORDNX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.


BCAMX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.76%
6M
6.83%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
12.75%

ORDNX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.63%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCAMX
Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund
7.76%14.23%23.81%21.04%-18.15%24.49%19.53%28.17%-8.51%20.64%
ORDNX
North Square Preferred and Income Securities Fund
1.33%7.30%14.81%15.24%-14.22%27.51%12.29%31.10%-0.98%20.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAMX and ORDNX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between BCAMX and ORDNX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAMX vs. ORDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAMX
BCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ORDNX
ORDNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ORDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ORDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and North Square Preferred and Income Securities Fund (ORDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCAMXORDNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

2.91

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

4.25

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.64

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.48

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.21

10.29

+1.92

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the ORDNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAMX and ORDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCAMXORDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.91

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.02

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.83

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.74

0.00

Drawdowns

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum ORDNX drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAMX and ORDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCAMXORDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-34.40%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-2.66%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-5.70%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-18.77%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-34.40%

+1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-3.82%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.64%

+1.21%

Volatility

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to North Square Preferred and Income Securities Fund (ORDNX) at 0.79%. This indicates that BCAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ORDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCAMXORDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

0.79%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

1.97%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

2.26%

+9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

6.70%

+10.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

14.18%

+3.69%

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ORDNX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCAMX vs. ORDNX - Dividend Comparison

BCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than ORDNX's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAMX
Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund
5.79%6.24%6.22%1.55%6.30%4.25%0.35%3.94%5.47%3.13%1.89%0.88%
ORDNX
North Square Preferred and Income Securities Fund
6.62%6.99%5.50%5.72%15.30%8.48%2.77%1.85%3.13%1.22%2.65%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCAMX and ORDNX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCAMX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to ORDNX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAMX dropped -33.06% vs ORDNX's -34.40%.

ORDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAMX and ORDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer