BCAMX vs. FNSTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BCAMX (Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund) and FNSTX (Fidelity Infrastructure Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BCAMX returned 11.27%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for FNSTX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.

Performance

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAMX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than FNSTX's 10.14% return.

BCAMX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 7.07%
• 1Y: 22.09%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 11.27%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

FNSTX

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 10.14%
• 6M: 10.20%
• 1Y: 26.78%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BCAMX Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund	7.46%	14.23%	23.81%	21.04%	-18.15%	24.49%	19.53%	5.47%
FNSTX Fidelity Infrastructure Fund	10.14%	27.42%	14.43%	8.44%	-7.59%	7.58%	12.80%	5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAMX and FNSTX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019	0.68

The correlation between BCAMX and FNSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCAMX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAMX

BCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 49
BCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FNSTX

FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCAMX	FNSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.66	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.22	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.30	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	3.16	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	9.81	+1.73

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAMX and FNSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum FNSTX drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAMX and FNSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCAMX	FNSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.06%	-35.82%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-8.43%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-13.63%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.22%	-21.97%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-2.79%	+2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.21%	-5.16%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	2.71%	-0.81%

Volatility

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) is 4.12%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that BCAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCAMX	FNSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	5.80%	-1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	13.11%	-3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	16.05%	-4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	15.25%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.89%	18.78%	-0.89%

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCAMX and FNSTX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.

Dividends

BCAMX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

BCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than FNSTX's 3.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCAMX Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund	5.81%	6.24%	6.22%	1.55%	6.30%	4.25%	0.35%	3.94%	5.47%	3.13%	1.89%	0.88%
FNSTX Fidelity Infrastructure Fund	3.80%	4.16%	1.59%	1.85%	1.35%	0.63%	0.80%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCAMX and FNSTX in my portfolio?

BCAMX and FNSTX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCAMX or FNSTX?

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to BCAMX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAMX dropped -33.06% vs FNSTX's -35.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.