PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAMX vs. DFIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and DFA International Core Equity Portfolio I (DFIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAMX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than DFIEX's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BCAMX has outperformed DFIEX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while DFIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.98% annualized return.


BCAMX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.76%
6M
6.83%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
12.75%

DFIEX

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.23%
YTD
10.70%
6M
14.20%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCAMX
Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund
7.76%14.23%23.81%21.04%-18.15%24.49%19.53%28.17%-8.51%20.64%
DFIEX
DFA International Core Equity Portfolio I
10.70%36.18%3.99%17.50%-13.51%13.85%7.73%21.70%-17.41%28.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAMX and DFIEX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2012

0.76

The correlation between BCAMX and DFIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAMX vs. DFIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAMX
BCAMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BCAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIEX
DFIEX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DFIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) and DFA International Core Equity Portfolio I (DFIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCAMXDFIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

2.06

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

2.86

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.66

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.21

10.43

+1.78

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DFIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAMX and DFIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCAMXDFIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.06

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.61

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.36

+0.37

Drawdowns

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum DFIEX drawdown of -62.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAMX and DFIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCAMXDFIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-62.22%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-11.01%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-12.81%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-28.66%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-41.04%

+7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.66%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-12.18%

+7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.81%

-0.96%

Volatility

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund (BCAMX) is 2.81%, while DFA International Core Equity Portfolio I (DFIEX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that BCAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCAMXDFIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

4.14%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

11.17%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

13.87%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

15.75%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

16.39%

+1.48%

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIEX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCAMX vs. DFIEX - Dividend Comparison

BCAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than DFIEX's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAMX
Boston Common ESG Impact U.S. Equity Fund
5.79%6.24%6.22%1.55%6.30%4.25%0.35%3.94%5.47%3.13%1.89%0.88%
DFIEX
DFA International Core Equity Portfolio I
2.92%3.22%3.42%3.36%2.88%2.98%1.77%2.90%2.95%2.49%2.76%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCAMX and DFIEX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIEX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to BCAMX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAMX dropped -33.06% vs DFIEX's -62.22%.

DFIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAMX and DFIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer