BCAIX vs. SAHMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCAIX (Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund) and SAHMX (SA International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BCAIX returned 7.01%/yr vs 10.86%/yr for SAHMX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCAIX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for SAHMX.

Performance

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAIX achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than SAHMX's 11.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BCAIX has underperformed SAHMX with an annualized return of 7.01%, while SAHMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.

BCAIX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: 3.51%
• 10Y*: 7.01%

SAHMX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 15.65%
• 1Y: 34.83%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCAIX Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund	9.78%	25.22%	0.55%	11.55%	-21.86%	3.41%	18.56%	23.74%	-13.46%	26.39%
SAHMX SA International Value Fund	11.49%	44.08%	5.44%	16.49%	-3.70%	17.59%	-2.48%	14.61%	-17.95%	25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAIX and SAHMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2010	0.77

The correlation between BCAIX and SAHMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BCAIX vs. SAHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAIX

BCAIX Risk / Return Rank: 20
BCAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BCAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BCAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BCAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BCAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

SAHMX

SAHMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
SAHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SAHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SAHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SAHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SAHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and SA International Value Fund (SAHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCAIX	SAHMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	3.14	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	4.32	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.57	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	4.40	-2.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	14.82	-8.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the SAHMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAIX and SAHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCAIX	SAHMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	3.14	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.87	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.67	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.33	-0.02

Drawdowns

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum SAHMX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAIX and SAHMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCAIX	SAHMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.34%	-66.58%	+29.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.15%	-8.72%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.34%	-14.85%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	-25.10%	-12.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.34%	-48.63%	+11.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.12%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.65%	-16.18%	+6.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	2.47%	+0.69%

Volatility

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to SA International Value Fund (SAHMX) at 2.81%. This indicates that BCAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCAIX	SAHMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	2.81%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.71%	9.26%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.71%	12.24%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.65%	15.49%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	16.45%	+0.20%

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than SAHMX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCAIX vs. SAHMX - Dividend Comparison

BCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than SAHMX's 4.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCAIX Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund	3.48%	3.82%	2.73%	2.32%	1.26%	3.34%	0.63%	2.25%	1.42%	1.18%	1.61%	1.10%
SAHMX SA International Value Fund	4.80%	5.35%	3.57%	3.46%	4.06%	3.05%	2.09%	3.66%	1.93%	2.46%	2.89%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCAIX and SAHMX in my portfolio?

BCAIX and SAHMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCAIX or SAHMX?

BCAIX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SAHMX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAIX dropped -37.34% vs SAHMX's -66.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.