BCAIX vs. GSIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX).
BCAIX is managed by Boston Common. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010. GSIMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.
Performance
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAIX Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund | -3.75% | 25.22% | 0.55% | 11.55% | -21.86% | 3.41% | 18.56% | 23.74% | -13.46% | 25.72% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.78% | 20.85% | 9.66% | 22.10% | -11.06% | 12.50% | 15.77% | 27.64% | -6.04% | 29.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCAIX achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 3.78% return.
BCAIX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
GSIMX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCAIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCAIX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank
BCAIX
GSIMX
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCAIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.28 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.69 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.81 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 7.41 | -3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCAIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.28 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.73 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.81 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCAIX and GSIMX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison
BCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than GSIMX's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAIX Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund | 3.97% | 3.82% | 2.73% | 2.32% | 1.26% | 3.34% | 0.63% | 2.25% | 1.42% | 1.18% | 1.61% | 1.10% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.93% | 5.12% | 11.18% | 2.36% | 4.89% | 2.23% | 0.18% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAIX and GSIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCAIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -28.84% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -8.75% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -25.37% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -6.12% | -5.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -4.85% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.15% | +1.02% |
Volatility
BCAIX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison
Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 4.78%. This indicates that BCAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCAIX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 4.78% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 7.35% | +3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 12.47% | +4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 14.42% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 15.77% | +0.75% |