PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBYY vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBYY vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than MMKT's 1.65% return.


BBYY

1D
-1.28%
1M
-14.59%
YTD
-24.84%
6M
-26.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBYY vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBYY and MMKT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBYY vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBYY vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBYYMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

15.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

151.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

908.66

BBYY vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBYY vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBYYMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.90%

-0.04%

-32.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.90%

-0.00%

-32.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-0.00%

-13.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

BBYY vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBYYMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.00%

0.23%

+24.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.00%

0.23%

+24.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

0.23%

+24.77%

BBYY vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBYY vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.76%, more than MMKT's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BBYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF
103.76%21.98%0.00%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.71%3.98%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBYY and MMKT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.

BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 103.76%, compared with 3.71% for MMKT.

BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.20% for MMKT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBYY and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer