BBYY vs. MMKT
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.
Performance
BBYY vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than MMKT's 1.65% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -14.59%
- YTD
- -24.84%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBYY vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -24.84% | -7.92% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.65% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and MMKT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MMKT
BBYY vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBYY | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 15.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 151.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 908.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and MMKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.90% | -0.04% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.90% | -0.00% | -32.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -0.00% | -13.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | MMKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.00% | 0.23% | +24.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 0.23% | +24.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 0.23% | +24.77% |
BBYY vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.76%, more than MMKT's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 103.76% | 21.98% | 0.00% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.71% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and MMKT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 103.76%, compared with 3.71% for MMKT.
BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.20% for MMKT.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and MMKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer