BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBUS.L (BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc) and LCUS.L (Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from JPMorgan and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.

Performance

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BBUS.L is traded in USD, while LCUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

BBUS.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: 13.29%
• 10Y*: —

LCUS.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc	10.13%	17.54%	24.99%	27.63%	-19.96%	27.64%	20.13%	12.83%
LCUS.L Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF	0.00%	5.91%	25.25%	26.69%	-21.44%	26.21%	17.83%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS.L and LCUS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.83

The correlation between BBUS.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBUS.L	LCUS.L
Technology	39.7%	31.9%
Communication Services	11.5%	10.0%
Financial Services	10.9%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	11.6%
Healthcare	8.0%	10.4%
Industrials	7.5%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	5.3%
Energy	3.2%	3.1%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.3%	2.1%

Return for Risk

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS.L

BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBUS.L	LCUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBUS.L	LCUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BBUS.L	LCUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.40%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBUS.L	LCUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.59%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	—	—

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBUS.L and LCUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBUS.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBUS.L nor LCUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCUS.L Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.83%	0.77%	0.69%	0.48%	0.02%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBUS.L and LCUS.L in my portfolio?

BBUS.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBUS.L or LCUS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBUS.L or LCUS.L?

BBUS.L and LCUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

What is the main difference between BBUS.L and LCUS.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi.