BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L
BBUS.L (BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc) and DGRG.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BBUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while DGRG.L tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS.L returned 13.29%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for DGRG.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBUS.L charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRG.L.
Performance
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBUS.L is traded in USD, while DGRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS.L achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than DGRG.L's 6.61% return.
BBUS.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRG.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc | 10.13% | 17.54% | 24.99% | 27.63% | -19.96% | 27.64% | 20.13% | 12.83% |
DGRG.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 6.61% | 13.57% | 18.13% | 18.02% | -8.25% | 25.56% | 12.09% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS.L and DGRG.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between BBUS.L and DGRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Communication Services
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Financial Services
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Healthcare
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Industrials
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Consumer Defensive
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Energy
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Utilities
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Basic Materials
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
Real Estate
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS.L
DGRG.L
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBUS.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.38 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.53 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 10.61 | +3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBUS.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.15 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.93 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than DGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS.L and DGRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -31.10% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -7.87% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -16.47% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.33% | -18.43% | -6.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.03% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -3.55% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.88% | +0.13% |
Volatility
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Volatility Comparison
BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) at 1.73%. This indicates that BBUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 1.73% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 6.74% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 9.28% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 13.57% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 14.72% | +3.14% |
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRG.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBUS.L vs. DGRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBUS.L nor DGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBUS.L and DGRG.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.
BBUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBUS.L and 0.33% for DGRG.L.
Find the right allocation for BBUS.L and DGRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer