BBTR.L vs. TREI.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BBTR.L (JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) and TREI.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - BBTR.L tracks the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index United States while TREI.L tracks the Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBTR.L returned -0.89%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for TREI.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBTR.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TREI.L.

Performance

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBTR.L achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 1.77% return.

BBTR.L

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: -0.53%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -0.89%
• 10Y*: —

TREI.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 1.65%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 4.63%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBTR.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc)	-0.46%	6.32%	0.61%	3.69%	-12.92%	-2.48%	7.69%
TREI.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF	1.77%	4.31%	5.17%	4.98%	0.53%	-0.02%	1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BBTR.L and TREI.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020	0.32

The correlation between BBTR.L and TREI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBTR.L

BBTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 27
BBTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BBTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BBTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BBTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BBTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

TREI.L

TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBTR.L	TREI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	6.57	-5.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	10.91	-9.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	4.71	-3.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	13.21	-12.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	159.95	-157.09

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBTR.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBTR.L drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -0.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTR.L and TREI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBTR.L	TREI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.19%	-0.68%	-19.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.14%	-0.29%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.66%	-0.29%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.54%	-0.67%	-16.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.35%	0.00%	-8.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.97%	-0.06%	-8.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	0.02%	+1.13%

Volatility

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that BBTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBTR.L	TREI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	0.10%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	0.50%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	0.59%	+3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.87%	0.55%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.90%	0.56%	+5.34%

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBTR.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBTR.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

BBTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TREI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBTR.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TREI.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF	3.92%	4.23%	4.98%	4.59%	1.51%	0.10%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBTR.L and TREI.L in my portfolio?

BBTR.L and TREI.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBTR.L or TREI.L?

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBTR.L or TREI.L?

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBTR.L.

What is the main difference between BBTR.L and TREI.L?

BBTR.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index United States, while TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBTR.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.