PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBTR.L is traded in USD, while JEGP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JEGP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBTR.L achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than JEGP.L's 0.09% return.


BBTR.L

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*

JEGP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.57%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
0.09%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBTR.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
-0.46%6.32%0.61%3.19%
JEGP.L
JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist
0.09%12.61%7.69%7,982.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BBTR.L and JEGP.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBTR.L
BBTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BBTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

JEGP.L
JEGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
JEGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JEGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBTR.LJEGP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.11

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

0.63

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

1.34

+1.52

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the JEGP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBTR.L and JEGP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBTR.L drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than JEGP.L's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTR.L and JEGP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBTR.LJEGP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-8.54%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-8.54%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-5.62%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-1.81%

-7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

3.99%

-2.84%

Volatility

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) is 1.00%, while JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that BBTR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBTR.LJEGP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

2.62%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

6.79%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

8.73%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

4,844.86%

-4,838.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

4,844.86%

-4,838.96%

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBTR.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JEGP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBTR.L vs. JEGP.L - Dividend Comparison

BBTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBTR.L and JEGP.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBTR.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBTR.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEGP.L.

BBTR.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while JEGP.L is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBTR.L and 0.35% for JEGP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBTR.L and JEGP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer