PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBTR.L achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than IBTU.L's 1.76% return.


BBTR.L

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*

IBTU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
6M
1.76%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBTR.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
-0.46%6.32%0.61%3.69%-12.92%-2.48%8.16%5.34%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.76%4.33%5.31%4.92%1.05%0.10%0.88%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BBTR.L and IBTU.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019

0.04

The correlation between BBTR.L and IBTU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBTR.L
BBTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BBTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBTR.LIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

3.84

-2.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

19.33

-18.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

94.97

-92.11

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBTR.L and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBTR.L drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -0.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTR.L and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBTR.LIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-0.72%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-0.20%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

-0.20%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-0.40%

-17.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

0.00%

-8.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-0.06%

-8.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.04%

+1.11%

Volatility

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (BBTR.L) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 0.28%. This indicates that BBTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBTR.LIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.28%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

0.77%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

1.11%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

1.02%

+4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

0.95%

+4.95%

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBTR.L and IBTU.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBTR.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

BBTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBTR.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.05%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBTR.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBTR.L and IBTU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

BBTR.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index United States, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBTR.L and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer