PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBTR.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBTR.DE having a 1.03% return and UEFI.DE slightly lower at 1.01%.


BBTR.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.03%
6M
0.24%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
-0.04%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*

UEFI.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.27%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
-0.59%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
0.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBTR.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.03%-5.45%6.15%0.23%-7.48%5.70%-3.71%7.39%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.01%-5.01%4.87%-0.30%-9.82%4.88%-0.27%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BBTR.DE and UEFI.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.87

The correlation between BBTR.DE and UEFI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBTR.DE
BBTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BBTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

UEFI.DE
UEFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBTR.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBTR.DEUEFI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.05

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

0.08

+0.94

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBTR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the UEFI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBTR.DE and UEFI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBTR.DEUEFI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.04

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.00

+0.05

Drawdowns

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, smaller than the maximum UEFI.DE drawdown of -32.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTR.DE and UEFI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBTR.DEUEFI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-32.63%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-16.26%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.14%

-16.26%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.20%

-16.26%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.35%

-17.90%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-14.47%

+4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

10.93%

-9.30%

Volatility

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBTR.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEFI.DE) at 0.74%. This indicates that BBTR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBTR.DEUEFI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.74%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

3.69%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.52%

21.96%

-16.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

13.03%

-4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

16.60%

-8.53%

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBTR.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UEFI.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBTR.DE vs. UEFI.DE - Dividend Comparison

BBTR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBTR.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFI.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.64%1.93%2.25%2.54%1.33%0.82%1.66%1.68%2.29%1.74%0.76%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BBTR.DE and UEFI.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UEFI.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFI.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBTR.DE.

BBTR.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond US Index, while UEFI.DE tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBTR.DE and 0.05% for UEFI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBTR.DE and UEFI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer