PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSGX vs. FUMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund (BBSGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BBSGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FUMBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSGX
Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund
-0.10%5.68%5.56%5.38%-3.18%-0.10%4.24%4.72%1.34%0.11%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.09%5.83%3.25%4.47%-5.84%-1.38%4.22%4.19%1.47%-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSGX and FUMBX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.69

The correlation between BBSGX and FUMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSGX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FUMBX
FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund (BBSGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBSGXFUMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSGXFUMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

Volatility

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSGXFUMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.49%

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSGX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSGX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

BBSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than FUMBX's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSGX
Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund
3.48%4.66%4.66%3.12%2.43%2.23%2.53%2.85%2.86%2.70%2.73%3.10%
FUMBX
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.76%3.51%2.91%1.64%0.86%1.15%1.41%1.88%1.64%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSGX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSGX and FUMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer