PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBNTX vs. FXIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBNTX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than FXIEX's 2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BBNTX has underperformed FXIEX with an annualized return of 1.40%, while FXIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.79% annualized return.


BBNTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
3.01%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
1.40%

FXIEX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.43%
YTD
2.02%
6M
2.55%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
0.62%5.19%0.45%3.64%-5.86%-0.23%4.26%6.09%0.73%3.28%
FXIEX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE
2.02%3.37%5.16%8.92%-10.89%2.19%7.22%8.45%1.00%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BBNTX and FXIEX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2012

0.68

The correlation between BBNTX and FXIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBNTX vs. FXIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBNTX
BBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FXIEX
FXIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FXIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FXIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBNTXFXIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.59

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.44

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

11.39

-6.58

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBNTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FXIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBNTX and FXIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBNTX drawdown since its inception was -10.25%, smaller than the maximum FXIEX drawdown of -15.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBNTX and FXIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBNTXFXIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-15.25%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-2.42%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-5.56%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.16%

-15.25%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.25%

-15.25%

+5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-2.88%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.71%

+0.22%

Volatility

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) is 0.56%, while PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that BBNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBNTXFXIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.84%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

2.17%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11%

3.46%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.84%

4.37%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.22%

4.10%

-0.88%

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBNTX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FXIEX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBNTX vs. FXIEX - Dividend Comparison

BBNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than FXIEX's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
2.68%3.52%2.82%2.07%1.94%1.59%1.62%2.43%2.51%2.39%2.73%2.98%
FXIEX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE
2.78%2.75%4.53%3.98%3.25%2.63%3.37%3.63%3.79%2.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBNTX and FXIEX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXIEX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to BBNTX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBNTX dropped -10.25% vs FXIEX's -15.25%.

FXIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBNTX and FXIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer