PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBNTX vs. BVATX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) and Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund (BVATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBNTX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than BVATX's -0.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBNTX having a 1.25% annualized return and BVATX not far behind at 1.20%.


BBNTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.87%
6M
-1.65%
YTD
-0.85%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.25%
ALL TIME*
3.35%

BVATX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-1.65%
YTD
-0.90%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
2.23%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.20%
ALL TIME*
2.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
-0.85%5.19%0.45%3.64%-5.86%-0.23%4.26%6.09%0.73%3.28%
BVATX
Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund
-0.90%4.70%0.32%3.60%-5.59%-0.59%4.28%6.32%0.79%3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BBNTX and BVATX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 1999

0.89

The correlation between BBNTX and BVATX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBNTX vs. BVATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBNTX
BBNTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BBNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BBNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BVATX
BVATX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BVATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVATX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BVATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVATX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) and Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund (BVATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBNTXBVATXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

0.85

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

2.24

+0.08

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the BVATX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBNTX and BVATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBNTX drawdown since its inception was -10.25%, roughly equal to the maximum BVATX drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBNTX and BVATX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBNTXBVATXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-10.24%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-2.57%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.39%

-3.47%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.16%

-9.97%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.25%

-10.24%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-2.53%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-1.61%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.97%

+0.10%

Volatility

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (BBNTX) and Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund (BVATX) have volatilities of 0.77% and 0.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBNTXBVATXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.75%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.92%

1.80%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

2.14%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.86%

2.83%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.22%

3.19%

+0.03%

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBNTX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than BVATX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBNTX vs. BVATX - Dividend Comparison

BBNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than BVATX's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBNTX
Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
2.50%3.52%2.82%2.07%1.94%1.59%1.62%2.43%2.51%2.39%2.73%2.98%
BVATX
Sterling Capital Virginia Intermediate Tax Free Fund
2.37%3.36%2.67%1.89%1.81%1.65%2.03%2.27%2.24%2.20%3.06%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBNTX and BVATX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBNTX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to BVATX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBNTX dropped -10.25% vs BVATX's -10.24%.

BBNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBNTX and BVATX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer