PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBLL.L is traded in GBP, while PR1T.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PR1T.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLL.L achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than PR1T.L's 1.78% return.


BBLL.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.42%
YTD
1.30%
6M
0.79%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PR1T.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.36%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
2.05%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBLL.L and PR1T.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.80

The correlation between BBLL.L and PR1T.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLL.L
BBLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1T.L
PR1T.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBLL.LPR1T.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.89

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

2.44

+0.11

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLL.L and PR1T.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBLL.LPR1T.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.70

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.23

+0.30

Drawdowns

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLL.L drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum PR1T.L drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLL.L and PR1T.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLL.LPR1T.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-16.09%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-5.15%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-6.46%

+5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-7.80%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.89%

-0.11%

Volatility

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.L) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) at 1.78%. This indicates that BBLL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1T.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLL.LPR1T.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

1.78%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

4.97%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.46%

6.58%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.43%

8.46%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.43%

8.34%

-1.91%

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1T.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLL.L vs. PR1T.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBLL.L nor PR1T.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBLL.L and PR1T.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1T.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1T.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBLL.L.

BBLL.L tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index, while PR1T.L tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBLL.L and 0.05% for PR1T.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLL.L and PR1T.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer