PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist (TRD1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBLL.DE having a 4.73% return and TRD1.DE slightly lower at 4.64%.


BBLL.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
1.70%
6M
3.71%
YTD
4.73%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*

TRD1.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
1.66%
6M
3.54%
YTD
4.64%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.73%-7.36%11.29%1.33%7.29%8.35%-9.17%
TRD1.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist
4.64%-7.35%11.23%1.38%6.73%8.36%-17.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLL.DE and TRD1.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.91

The correlation between BBLL.DE and TRD1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLL.DE
BBLL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TRD1.DE
TRD1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TRD1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRD1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist (TRD1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBLL.DETRD1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.44

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

3.75

+0.01

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the TRD1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLL.DE and TRD1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLL.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, roughly equal to the maximum TRD1.DE drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLL.DE and TRD1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLL.DETRD1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-17.81%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.38%

-3.70%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.65%

-11.60%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.65%

-11.70%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-5.36%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-8.29%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.42%

+0.01%

Volatility

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist (TRD1.DE) at 1.48%. This indicates that BBLL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRD1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLL.DETRD1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

1.48%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

4.65%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

6.31%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.45%

7.48%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.26%

8.09%

+0.17%

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLL.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TRD1.DE's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLL.DE vs. TRD1.DE - Dividend Comparison

BBLL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRD1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRD1.DE
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.86%4.35%4.82%4.70%1.55%0.10%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BBLL.DE and TRD1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRD1.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRD1.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBLL.DE.

BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index, while TRD1.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBLL.DE and 0.06% for TRD1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLL.DE and TRD1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer