BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE
BBLL.DE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MDBA.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both Government Bonds funds - BBLL.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index while MDBA.DE tracks the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBLL.DE returned 4.31%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for MDBA.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBLL.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MDBA.DE.
Performance
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBLL.DE achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than MDBA.DE's 1.20% return.
BBLL.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 1.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLL.DE JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.66% | -7.37% | 11.29% | 1.32% | 7.29% | 8.35% | -8.23% | 1.14% |
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.20% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -4.47% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBLL.DE and MDBA.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BBLL.DE and MDBA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BBLL.DE
MDBA.DE
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBLL.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.43 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 1.04 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBLL.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.31 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.26 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.24 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBLL.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, which is greater than MDBA.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLL.DE and MDBA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBLL.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -12.17% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.38% | -3.81% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.65% | -10.11% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.65% | -12.02% | +0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -6.13% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -5.56% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.55% | +0.06% |
Volatility
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) at 0.85%. This indicates that BBLL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBLL.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 0.85% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.12% | 3.65% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.07% | 5.31% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 7.26% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 7.03% | +0.19% |
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBLL.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBLL.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBLL.DE nor MDBA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, BBLL.DE and MDBA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBLL.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBLL.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.
BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index, while MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBLL.DE and 0.15% for MDBA.DE.
Find the right allocation for BBLL.DE and MDBA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer