PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBISX vs. OWVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX) and Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (OWVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBISX achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than OWVAX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BBISX has outperformed OWVAX with an annualized return of 13.15%, while OWVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.83% annualized return.


BBISX

1D
0.07%
1M
4.63%
YTD
16.13%
6M
17.53%
1Y
35.00%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
13.15%

OWVAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.36%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBISX
Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund
16.13%23.54%20.93%12.49%-5.96%31.07%-1.57%23.81%-10.28%18.82%
OWVAX
Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
1.00%5.44%1.18%4.18%-5.91%0.39%4.49%6.15%0.67%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BBISX and OWVAX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

-0.08

The correlation between BBISX and OWVAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBISX vs. OWVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBISX
BBISX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BBISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBISX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

OWVAX
OWVAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
OWVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
OWVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX) and Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (OWVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBISXOWVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.76

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

2.26

+3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.45

7.51

+13.94

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBISX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the OWVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBISX and OWVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBISXOWVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

2.73

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.42

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.60

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.07

-0.60

Drawdowns

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBISX drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, which is greater than OWVAX's maximum drawdown of -12.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBISX and OWVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBISXOWVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.31%

-12.59%

-46.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-2.38%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-3.60%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.45%

-9.42%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.37%

-9.79%

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.71%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-1.63%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.72%

+0.87%

Volatility

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund (OWVAX) at 0.78%. This indicates that BBISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OWVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBISXOWVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

0.78%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

1.56%

+7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

1.97%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

2.69%

+12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

3.09%

+14.54%

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBISX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than OWVAX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBISX vs. OWVAX - Dividend Comparison

BBISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than OWVAX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBISX
Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund
1.29%1.53%1.88%1.73%1.56%0.43%3.22%8.20%11.93%2.86%1.90%1.68%
OWVAX
Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund
2.88%3.76%3.08%2.26%1.99%1.76%2.03%2.73%2.58%2.47%2.81%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBISX and OWVAX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBISX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to OWVAX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBISX dropped -59.31% vs OWVAX's -12.59%.

BBISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBISX and OWVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer