PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBISX vs. BBSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund (BBSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BBISX

1D
0.57%
1M
4.76%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.55%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
13.08%

BBSGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBISX
Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund
15.39%23.54%20.93%12.49%-5.96%31.07%-1.57%23.81%-10.28%18.82%
BBSGX
Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund
-0.10%5.68%5.56%5.38%-3.18%-0.10%4.24%4.72%1.34%1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BBISX and BBSGX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

-0.07

The correlation between BBISX and BBSGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBISX vs. BBSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBISX
BBISX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BBISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBISX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund (BBSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBISXBBSGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.61

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBISXBBSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Drawdowns

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBISXBBSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBISXBBSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBISX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSGX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBISX vs. BBSGX - Dividend Comparison

BBISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than BBSGX's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBISX
Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund
1.30%1.53%1.88%1.73%1.56%0.43%3.22%8.20%11.93%2.86%1.90%1.68%
BBSGX
Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund
3.48%4.66%4.66%3.12%2.43%2.23%2.53%2.85%2.86%2.70%2.73%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBISX and BBSGX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBISX and BBSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer