PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L) and iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIL.L achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than SDIG.L's 0.98% return.


BBIL.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.70%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*

SDIG.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.16%
6M
1.03%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
2.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIL.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.84%4.30%5.16%4.90%1.07%-0.02%0.75%0.98%
SDIG.L
iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.98%6.12%4.93%5.83%-4.83%-0.48%4.51%1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIL.L and SDIG.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2019

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIL.L
BBIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BBIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SDIG.L
SDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L) and iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBIL.LSDIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+16.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.08

1.38

+2.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

56.21

3.25

+52.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

259.88

13.59

+246.29

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.78, which is higher than the SDIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIL.L and SDIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIL.L drawdown since its inception was -0.29%, smaller than the maximum SDIG.L drawdown of -11.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIL.L and SDIG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIL.LSDIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-11.39%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-1.17%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.10%

-1.18%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.23%

-7.59%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.17%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.93%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.28%

-0.27%

Volatility

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (BBIL.L) is 0.09%, while iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDIG.L) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that BBIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIL.LSDIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

0.61%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.31%

1.55%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43%

1.94%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

2.66%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

3.75%

-3.38%

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBIL.L vs. SDIG.L - Dividend Comparison

BBIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIL.L
JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDIG.L
iShares $ Short Duration Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.40%4.32%4.03%3.11%1.85%1.49%2.12%2.63%2.29%1.84%1.75%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIL.L and SDIG.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBIL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBIL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SDIG.L.

BBIL.L tracks ICE BofA 0-1Y US Treasury TR USD, while SDIG.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. They also come from different issuers: J.P. Morgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BBIL.L and 0.20% for SDIG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIL.L and SDIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer