BBHY vs. JPST
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBHY is passively managed, while JPST is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 4.03%/yr vs 3.60%/yr for JPST. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPST.
Performance
BBHY vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBHY having a 1.29% return and JPST slightly higher at 1.34%.
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 2.71% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.34% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.18% | 3.34% | 2.23% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and JPST is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2017 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, BBHY and JPST have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BBHY vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBHY
JPST
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
BBHY
JPST
Industrials
BBHY
JPST
Communication Services
BBHY
JPST
Healthcare
BBHY
JPST
Energy
BBHY
JPST
Financial Services
BBHY
JPST
Technology
BBHY
JPST
Real Estate
BBHY
JPST
Basic Materials
BBHY
JPST
Consumer Defensive
BBHY
JPST
Utilities
BBHY
JPST
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
JPST
BBHY vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBHY | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 3.90 | -2.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 28.74 | -25.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 141.65 | -128.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHY | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 8.02 | -6.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 6.28 | -5.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 3.19 | -2.56 |
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and JPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -3.28% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -0.15% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -0.30% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -0.79% | -14.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.08% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -0.08% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.03% | +0.50% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that BBHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.15% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 0.36% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 0.54% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 0.58% | +6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 0.93% | +6.60% |
BBHY vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBHY vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than JPST's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.26% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHY and JPST have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs JPST's -3.28%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.03% vs 3.60% for JPST. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 4.26% for JPST.
BBHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.18% for JPST.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and JPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer