BBHY vs. HYHG
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 4.03%/yr vs 6.99%/yr for HYHG. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
BBHY vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.06% return.
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
BBHY vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.06% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -1.71% | 5.75% | 0.16% | 12.02% | -1.95% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and HYHG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.56 |
The correlation between BBHY and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBHY vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBHY
HYHG
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBHY
HYHG
-
Industrials
BBHY
HYHG
-
Communication Services
BBHY
HYHG
Healthcare
BBHY
HYHG
Energy
BBHY
HYHG
-
Financial Services
BBHY
HYHG
-
Technology
BBHY
HYHG
-
Real Estate
BBHY
HYHG
-
Basic Materials
BBHY
HYHG
-
Consumer Defensive
BBHY
HYHG
-
Utilities
BBHY
HYHG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
HYHG
BBHY vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.70 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 12.16 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.35 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.86 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.46 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, roughly equal to the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -25.71% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -2.02% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -7.47% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -9.21% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.29% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -3.04% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.61% | -0.08% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) is 1.16%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that BBHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.39% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 4.29% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 5.56% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 8.15% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 9.15% | -1.62% |
BBHY vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHY vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than HYHG's 6.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.78% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHY and HYHG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to BBHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 5-year performance, HYHG leads with 6.99% vs 4.03% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 6.78% for HYHG.
BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.50% for HYHG.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer