BBGVX vs. DFFGX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

BBGVX (Sterling Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Fund) and DFFGX (DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, BBGVX returned 1.18%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for DFFGX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBGVX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DFFGX.

Performance

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Fund (BBGVX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGVX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than DFFGX's 1.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBGVX having a 1.18% annualized return and DFFGX not far behind at 1.16%.

BBGVX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 0.68%
• 10Y*: 1.18%

DFFGX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 1.48%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 4.16%
• 5Y*: 1.88%
• 10Y*: 1.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBGVX Sterling Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Fund	0.58%	7.11%	2.28%	4.37%	-9.37%	-1.77%	4.90%	5.42%	0.68%	1.51%
DFFGX DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio	1.48%	3.12%	5.29%	5.01%	-4.41%	-1.27%	0.39%	2.52%	1.17%	0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGVX and DFFGX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between BBGVX and DFFGX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BBGVX vs. DFFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGVX

BBGVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
BBGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BBGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BBGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BBGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BBGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

DFFGX

DFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
DFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Fund (BBGVX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBGVX	DFFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	4.78	-3.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	8.66	-7.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	4.23	-3.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	12.18	-10.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.84	87.02	-83.18

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the DFFGX Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGVX and DFFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGVX drawdown since its inception was -14.04%, which is greater than DFFGX's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGVX and DFFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBGVX	DFFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.04%	-6.49%	-7.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.50%	-0.30%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.19%	-1.19%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.86%	-6.49%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.04%	-6.49%	-7.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-0.10%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-0.77%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.27%	+0.64%

Volatility

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Fund (BBGVX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX) at 0.43%. This indicates that BBGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBGVX	DFFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	0.43%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.48%	0.65%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28%	1.27%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.78%	1.84%	+2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.84%	1.55%	+2.29%

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGVX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DFFGX's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBGVX vs. DFFGX - Dividend Comparison

BBGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than DFFGX's 3.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBGVX Sterling Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Fund	2.83%	2.72%	3.54%	2.49%	2.56%	2.71%	2.28%	2.80%	2.92%	2.43%	2.16%	2.09%
DFFGX DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio	3.78%	2.98%	4.87%	3.57%	1.85%	0.15%	0.29%	1.83%	1.53%	1.18%	0.99%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBGVX and DFFGX in my portfolio?

BBGVX and DFFGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBGVX or DFFGX?

BBGVX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to DFFGX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGVX dropped -14.04% vs DFFGX's -6.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.