BBGSX vs. KMKAX
BBGSX (Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and KMKAX (Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BBGSX returned 11.34%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for KMKAX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBGSX charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for KMKAX.
Performance
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBGSX achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than KMKAX's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGSX has underperformed KMKAX with an annualized return of 11.34%, while KMKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.90% annualized return.
BBGSX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
KMKAX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -9.76%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- -1.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.26%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.90%
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBGSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 11.42% | 0.99% | 14.47% | 20.98% | -29.84% | 16.57% | 34.41% | 29.01% | -2.18% | 21.47% |
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 6.59% | -3.31% | 83.58% | -7.57% | 14.69% | 27.69% | 19.31% | 22.42% | -10.92% | 46.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBGSX and KMKAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBGSX vs. KMKAX — Risk / Return Rank
BBGSX
KMKAX
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBGSX | KMKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | -0.13 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | -0.32 | +2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBGSX drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum KMKAX drawdown of -65.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGSX and KMKAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBGSX | KMKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.95% | -65.57% | +27.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.72% | -20.20% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.11% | -28.45% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.95% | -31.56% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.95% | -31.56% | -6.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.04% | +22.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -15.52% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 7.89% | -2.36% |
Volatility
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) is 6.51%, while Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that BBGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBGSX | KMKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 7.01% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 19.59% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 23.85% | -5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 26.50% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 23.71% | -2.68% |
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBGSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKAX's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Dividend Comparison
BBGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBGSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.32% | 0.19% | 18.00% | 12.59% | 4.07% | 6.12% | 1.09% | 0.36% |
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 0.57% | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 0.02% | 0.07% | 9.28% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBGSX and KMKAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMKAX has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to BBGSX (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGSX dropped -37.95% vs KMKAX's -65.57%.
BBGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBGSX and KMKAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer