PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBGSX vs. KMKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGSX achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than KMKAX's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGSX has underperformed KMKAX with an annualized return of 11.34%, while KMKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.90% annualized return.


BBGSX

1D
0.89%
1M
3.89%
YTD
11.42%
6M
9.01%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
11.34%

KMKAX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-9.76%
YTD
6.59%
6M
4.86%
1Y
-1.60%
3Y*
31.26%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
18.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBGSX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
11.42%0.99%14.47%20.98%-29.84%16.57%34.41%29.01%-2.18%21.47%
KMKAX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund
6.59%-3.31%83.58%-7.57%14.69%27.69%19.31%22.42%-10.92%46.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGSX and KMKAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBGSX vs. KMKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGSX
BBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

KMKAX
KMKAX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KMKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KMKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBGSXKMKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.00

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

-0.13

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

-0.32

+2.98

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the KMKAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGSX and KMKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGSX drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum KMKAX drawdown of -65.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGSX and KMKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBGSXKMKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-65.57%

+27.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

-20.20%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.11%

-28.45%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.95%

-31.56%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.95%

-31.56%

-6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-22.04%

+22.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-15.52%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

7.89%

-2.36%

Volatility

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) is 6.51%, while Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that BBGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBGSXKMKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

7.01%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

19.59%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

23.85%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

26.50%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

23.71%

-2.68%

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKAX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBGSX vs. KMKAX - Dividend Comparison

BBGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBGSX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.58%0.32%0.19%18.00%12.59%4.07%6.12%1.09%0.36%
KMKAX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund
0.57%0.61%0.66%0.69%1.19%1.29%0.02%0.07%9.28%0.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBGSX and KMKAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMKAX has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to BBGSX (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGSX dropped -37.95% vs KMKAX's -65.57%.

BBGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBGSX and KMKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer