PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBGE.L vs. SUES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (BBGE.L) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (SUES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBGE.L is traded in GBP, while SUES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGE.L achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than SUES.L's 16.30% return.


BBGE.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.92%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
-2.18%
10Y*

SUES.L

1D
-1.52%
1M
3.02%
YTD
16.30%
6M
18.19%
1Y
39.85%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBGE.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.88%5.79%-3.07%4.85%-13.84%-9.87%10.91%3.18%
SUES.L
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
16.30%22.98%6.49%-4.42%-8.54%0.22%14.91%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGE.L and SUES.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.10

The correlation between BBGE.L and SUES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGE.L
BBGE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BBGE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SUES.L
SUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (BBGE.L) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (SUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBGE.LSUES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.44

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.79

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

13.42

-12.17

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the SUES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGE.L and SUES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBGE.LSUES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.51

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.32

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.43

-0.53

Drawdowns

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGE.L drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, smaller than the maximum SUES.L drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGE.L and SUES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBGE.LSUES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-30.11%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.67%

-10.48%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-17.77%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.06%

-24.78%

+3.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.17%

-2.59%

-16.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-9.15%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.96%

-0.87%

Volatility

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (BBGE.L) is 1.84%, while iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (SUES.L) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that BBGE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBGE.LSUES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

5.89%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

12.99%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

15.81%

-10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

16.41%

-8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

17.94%

-9.92%

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGE.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SUES.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBGE.L vs. SUES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBGE.L nor SUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBGE.L and SUES.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBGE.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBGE.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUES.L.

BBGE.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while SUES.L is Emerging Markets Equities. BBGE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while SUES.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BBGE.L and 0.25% for SUES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBGE.L and SUES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer