BBEU vs. EWP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BBEU (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - BBEU tracks the Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index while EWP tracks the MSCI Spain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBEU returned 8.71%/yr vs 18.75%/yr for EWP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBEU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWP.

Performance

BBEU vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 11.25% return.

BBEU

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 17.64%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

EWP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 6M: 11.48%
• 1Y: 41.28%
• 3Y*: 33.03%
• 5Y*: 18.75%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF	4.42%	36.37%	1.85%	20.31%	-14.72%	17.50%	5.00%	23.96%	-13.25%
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	11.25%	78.03%	5.70%	30.26%	-5.18%	0.25%	-3.94%	11.93%	-11.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and EWP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018	0.84

The correlation between BBEU and EWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBEU vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBEU	EWP
Financial Services	24.0%	42.4%
Industrials	19.2%	16.3%
Healthcare	13.1%	1.3%
Technology	9.4%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	4.6%
Basic Materials	5.8%	-
Energy	5.3%	4.1%
Utilities	4.6%	21.4%
Communication Services	3.0%	2.8%
Real Estate	0.5%	2.8%

Return for Risk

BBEU vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU

BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 32
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 37

EWP

EWP Risk / Return Rank: 71
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBEU	EWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.21	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	2.94	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.38	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	3.64	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.36	12.92	-7.56

BBEU vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and EWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBEU	EWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.27%	-61.19%	+24.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-11.38%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.23%	-12.19%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.08%	-31.63%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	-0.72%	-2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-21.40%	+15.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	3.20%	+0.10%

Volatility

BBEU vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBEU	EWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	5.49%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	16.07%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	18.81%	-2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	20.29%	-2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	21.56%	-2.22%

BBEU vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBEU vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than EWP's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF	2.85%	2.83%	4.16%	2.94%	4.72%	2.63%	2.29%	3.24%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	2.82%	2.27%	4.35%	2.70%	3.07%	3.29%	2.56%	3.72%	3.69%	2.72%	4.65%	3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBEU and EWP in my portfolio?

BBEU and EWP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBEU or EWP?

BBEU has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to EWP (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs EWP's -61.19%.

Which ETF is better, BBEU or EWP?

On 5-year performance, EWP leads with 18.75% vs 8.71% for BBEU. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBEU or EWP?

Over the 5-year period, EWP has performed better with a 18.75% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBEU or EWP?

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBEU or EWP?

BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.82% for EWP.

What is the main difference between BBEU and EWP?

BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBEU and 0.50% for EWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.