PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (BBEG.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEG.DE achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than EAH.DE's 0.01% return.


BBEG.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.14%
1Y
0.29%
3Y*
2.32%
5Y*
-2.32%
10Y*

EAH.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
-1.07%
3Y*
1.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBEG.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.14%0.60%1.39%6.92%-18.49%-1.34%
EAH.DE
Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.01%-2.11%-0.57%8.84%-30.65%-1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEG.DE and EAH.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.99

The correlation between BBEG.DE and EAH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEG.DE
BBEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BBEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EAH.DE
EAH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EAH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (BBEG.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEG.DEEAH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.97

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.33

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

-0.71

+0.65

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is higher than the EAH.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEG.DE and EAH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEG.DEEAH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

-0.24

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

-0.59

+0.45

Drawdowns

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEG.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, smaller than the maximum EAH.DE drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEG.DE and EAH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEG.DEEAH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.76%

-36.30%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-4.72%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.11%

-7.83%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.39%

-29.61%

+15.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-25.57%

+14.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

2.19%

-0.81%

Volatility

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders EUR Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (BBEG.DE) is 1.69%, while Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that BBEG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEG.DEEAH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

2.49%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

5.30%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

6.55%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.43%

10.85%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

10.85%

-4.87%

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEG.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EAH.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBEG.DE vs. EAH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBEG.DE nor EAH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BBEG.DE and EAH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBEG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBEG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EAH.DE.

BBEG.DE tracks JP Morgan EMU Government Bond, while EAH.DE tracks Solactive Euro Government Green Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BBEG.DE and 0.20% for EAH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEG.DE and EAH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer