BBDD.L vs. USFM.L
BBDD.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)) and USFM.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from JPMorgan and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBDD.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for USFM.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBDD.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for USFM.L.
Performance
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBDD.L achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than USFM.L's 12.16% return.
BBDD.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 28.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
USFM.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 10.30% | 9.41% | 27.20% | 20.72% | -10.45% | 29.23% | 16.11% | 11.88% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 12.16% | 5.73% | 20.11% | 10.47% | -3.22% | 26.12% | 10.79% | 11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBDD.L and USFM.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BBDD.L and USFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Financial Services
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Communication Services
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Consumer Cyclical
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Healthcare
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Industrials
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Consumer Defensive
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Energy
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Utilities
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Real Estate
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Basic Materials
BBDD.L
USFM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBDD.L
USFM.L
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBDD.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.46 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.51 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 16.06 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBDD.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.61 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.88 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBDD.L drawdown since its inception was -25.72%, smaller than the maximum USFM.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBDD.L and USFM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBDD.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.72% | -27.52% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.78% | -5.47% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -17.40% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | -17.40% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -3.49% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.54% | +0.69% |
Volatility
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) is 2.63%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that BBDD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBDD.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.78% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 6.77% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 9.46% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 13.21% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 15.32% | +0.85% |
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBDD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USFM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBDD.L vs. USFM.L - Dividend Comparison
BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than USFM.L's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.99% | 1.12% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.44% | 0.94% | 1.46% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.01% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBDD.L and USFM.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBDD.L and 0.25% for USFM.L.
Find the right allocation for BBDD.L and USFM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer