PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBDD.L vs. JREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBDD.L is traded in GBp, while JREG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JREG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBDD.L having a 10.30% return and JREG.L slightly lower at 9.88%.


BBDD.L

1D
0.06%
1M
5.57%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.10%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*

JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
4.54%
YTD
9.88%
6M
9.92%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
10.30%9.41%27.20%20.72%-10.45%29.23%16.11%11.88%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.88%11.22%20.75%19.41%-7.92%25.50%13.77%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BBDD.L and JREG.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.90

The correlation between BBDD.L and JREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBDD.L
JREG.L

Technology

35.4%
28.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
15.4%

Communication Services

11.5%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.9%

Industrials

8.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.6%

Energy

3.6%
4.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.2%

Technology

BBDD.L
35.4%
JREG.L
28.6%

Financial Services

BBDD.L
11.8%
JREG.L
15.4%

Communication Services

BBDD.L
11.5%
JREG.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBDD.L
10.1%
JREG.L
10.1%

Healthcare

BBDD.L
8.6%
JREG.L
8.9%

Industrials

BBDD.L
8.4%
JREG.L
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBDD.L
4.8%
JREG.L
4.6%

Energy

BBDD.L
3.6%
JREG.L
4.2%

Utilities

BBDD.L
2.3%
JREG.L
2.9%

Real Estate

BBDD.L
1.8%
JREG.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

BBDD.L
1.7%
JREG.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBDD.L
BBDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBDD.LJREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.42

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

4.05

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.78

15.89

-3.11

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the JREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBDD.L and JREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBDD.LJREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.28

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.92

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.86

+0.10

Drawdowns

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBDD.L drawdown since its inception was -25.72%, roughly equal to the maximum JREG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBDD.L and JREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBDD.LJREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.72%

-25.88%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.78%

-6.51%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-18.75%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-18.75%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.18%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.17%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.66%

+0.57%

Volatility

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) is 2.63%, while JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that BBDD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBDD.LJREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

3.26%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.75%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

11.57%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

14.39%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.18%

-0.01%

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBDD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBDD.L vs. JREG.L - Dividend Comparison

BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while JREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.99%1.12%0.99%1.31%1.44%0.94%1.46%0.79%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBDD.L and JREG.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREG.L.

BBDD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JREG.L is Global Equities. BBDD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBDD.L and 0.25% for JREG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBDD.L and JREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer