PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBDD.L is traded in GBp, while IDFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDFF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBDD.L achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 24.04% return.


BBDD.L

1D
-0.95%
1M
-0.82%
6M
7.27%
YTD
8.77%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*

IDFF.L

1D
-2.46%
1M
-11.85%
6M
14.81%
YTD
24.04%
1Y
42.57%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.77%9.41%27.20%20.72%-10.45%29.23%16.11%11.80%
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
24.04%29.55%14.11%-3.61%-12.49%-8.34%22.21%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BBDD.L and IDFF.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2019

0.53

The correlation between BBDD.L and IDFF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBDD.L
BBDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IDFF.L
IDFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBDD.LIDFF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.95

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

10.11

-1.80

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBDD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the IDFF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBDD.L and IDFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBDD.L drawdown since its inception was -25.72%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBDD.L and IDFF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBDD.LIDFF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.72%

-51.16%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.78%

-14.35%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-19.80%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-32.24%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-14.35%

+12.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-12.97%

+9.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

4.20%

-1.92%

Volatility

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) is 3.19%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that BBDD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBDD.LIDFF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

10.22%

-7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

21.04%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

23.79%

-12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

20.68%

-6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

20.13%

-4.07%

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBDD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBDD.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison

BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, which matches IDFF.L's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBDD.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.12%1.12%0.99%1.31%1.44%0.94%1.46%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.13%1.46%1.85%1.85%2.07%1.39%1.13%1.67%2.04%1.50%1.92%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBDD.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.

BBDD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDFF.L is Asia Pacific Equities. BBDD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IDFF.L tracks MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBDD.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBDD.L and IDFF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer