BBBMX vs. SEMRX
BBBMX (BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N) and SEMRX (Semper Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, BBBMX returned 3.35%/yr vs 3.41%/yr for SEMRX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBBMX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SEMRX.
Performance
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBMX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SEMRX's 2.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BBBMX having a 3.35% annualized return and SEMRX not far ahead at 3.41%.
BBBMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 3.35%
SEMRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 5.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBMX BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N | 1.23% | 5.54% | 6.81% | 7.44% | -1.48% | 1.10% | 2.78% | 4.30% | 1.99% | 2.31% |
SEMRX Semper Short Duration Fund | 2.15% | 6.47% | 8.21% | 8.76% | -1.69% | 1.93% | -1.19% | 3.48% | 2.11% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBMX and SEMRX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.30 |
The correlation between BBBMX and SEMRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBMX vs. SEMRX — Risk / Return Rank
BBBMX
SEMRX
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N (BBBMX) and Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBBMX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.46 | 3.09 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.96 | 11.22 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.03 | 46.32 | -9.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBMX drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum SEMRX drawdown of -13.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBMX and SEMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBMX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -13.09% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.57% | -0.52% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.57% | -0.63% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.18% | -4.05% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.50% | -13.09% | +6.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.10% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -0.62% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.12% | 0.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Volatility Comparison
BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N (BBBMX) and Semper Short Duration Fund (SEMRX) have volatilities of 0.49% and 0.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBMX | SEMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.51% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.21% | 1.28% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62% | 1.86% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 1.84% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.48% | 2.31% | -0.83% |
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBMX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMRX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBBMX vs. SEMRX - Dividend Comparison
BBBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than SEMRX's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBMX BBH Limited Duration Fund Class N | 4.53% | 4.60% | 4.80% | 4.23% | 1.78% | 1.29% | 2.03% | 2.93% | 2.57% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.72% |
SEMRX Semper Short Duration Fund | 5.67% | 5.94% | 6.13% | 6.05% | 3.22% | 1.71% | 1.95% | 2.90% | 2.70% | 2.20% | 3.03% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBBMX and SEMRX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEMRX has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to BBBMX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBMX dropped -6.50% vs SEMRX's -13.09%.
SEMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBMX and SEMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer