BBB vs. AVMA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BBB (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF) and AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. BBB is passively managed, while AVMA is actively managed. Over the past year, BBB returned 0.25% vs 20.31% for AVMA. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBB charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for AVMA.

Performance

BBB vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than AVMA's 10.57% return.

BBB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: -0.59%
• YTD: -0.67%
• 1Y: 0.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.95%

AVMA

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 6.83%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 1Y: 20.31%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	$728.89K	$743.13K	$593.62K
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF	$66.52K	$79.94K	$49.31K

BBB vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF	-0.67%	9.73%	38.82%	-0.86%
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	10.57%	16.72%	10.01%	-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BBB and AVMA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023	0.68

The correlation between BBB and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBB vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBB

BBB Risk / Return Rank: 10
BBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BBB Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BBB Martin Ratio Rank: 9

AVMA

AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 87
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBB vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBB	AVMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	2.08	-2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	3.00	-3.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.39	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	3.08	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	12.79	-13.01

BBB vs. AVMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBB Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the AVMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBB and AVMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBB vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and AVMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBB	AVMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.98%	-11.81%	-10.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.74%	-6.40%	-11.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-0.80%	-6.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-1.52%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.60%	1.54%	+6.06%

Volatility

BBB vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison

CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) at 2.43%. This indicates that BBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBB	AVMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	2.43%	+1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.66%	7.67%	+5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.18%	9.47%	+8.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.75%	10.28%	+11.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.75%	10.28%	+11.47%

BBB vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBB vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison

BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than AVMA's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	2.02%	2.21%	2.28%	1.11%
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.16%	0.21%	6.74%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBB and AVMA in my portfolio?

BBB and AVMA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBB or AVMA?

BBB has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to AVMA (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs AVMA's -11.81%.

Which ETF is better, BBB or AVMA?

On 1-year performance, AVMA leads with 20.31% vs 0.25% for BBB. On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBB or AVMA?

Over the 1-year period, AVMA has performed better with a 20.31% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBB or AVMA?

AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for BBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBB or AVMA?

AVMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.16% for BBB.

What is the main difference between BBB and AVMA?

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 0.21% for AVMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.