BAVA vs. SETH
BAVA (Bitwise Avalanche ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BAVA is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BAVA vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BAVA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -11.65%
- 6M
- 42.63%
- YTD
- 27.84%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -31.80%
BAVA vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAVA Bitwise Avalanche ETF | -29.24% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAVA and SETH is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026 | -0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAVA vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
BAVA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETH
BAVA vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Avalanche ETF (BAVA) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAVA | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAVA vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAVA drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAVA and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAVA | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -80.74% | +40.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.21% | -64.88% | +29.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -54.97% | +34.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.29% | — |
Volatility
BAVA vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAVA | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.71% | 67.56% | -15.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.71% | 69.21% | -17.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.71% | 69.21% | -17.50% |
Dividends
BAVA vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
BAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAVA Bitwise Avalanche ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 17.46% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAVA and SETH have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 17.46%, compared with 0.00% for BAVA.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and ProShares.
Find the right allocation for BAVA and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer