BAVA vs. BTCZ
BAVA (Bitwise Avalanche ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BAVA vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BAVA
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -25.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- 47.56%
- YTD
- 57.72%
- 6M
- 58.85%
- 1Y
- 94.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAVA vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAVA Bitwise Avalanche ETF | -29.45% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 46.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAVA and BTCZ is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026 | -0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAVA vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
BAVA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTCZ
BAVA vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Avalanche ETF (BAVA) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAVA | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAVA vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAVA drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAVA and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAVA | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -91.06% | +50.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.39% | -74.57% | +39.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -73.69% | +57.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.83% | — |
Volatility
BAVA vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAVA | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 69.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.55% | 89.04% | -35.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 96.89% | -43.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 96.89% | -43.34% |
Dividends
BAVA vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
BAVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BAVA Bitwise Avalanche ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAVA and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BAVA.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and T-Rex.
Find the right allocation for BAVA and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer